It shouldn't be surprising if gender variance is discovered to be
process rather than a diverse collection of biological
imperfections. After all, if we pair a black horse with a white
horse the resultant offspring can be black with dormant white
characteristics, or white with dormant black characteristics, or any
shading in between including pinto, each with dormant
characteristics. Yet, even our scientific and medical communities
seem to have a blind spot when it comes to sex. The categories of
male and female are viewed as exempt from the laws of genetics, even
though there are countless anomalies that put the lie to this
misconception. There are males who have various feminine
features; female hips, breasts, a feminine voice, never grow a
beard, soft skin, desire other males, and some even dress as women,
just as there are females with masculine characteristics and
inclinations. Many of these qualities are present in every higher
species and not peculiar only to humankind.
These genetic propensities, much as bootstrap programs in a
computer, set the stage for human development within our various
bipolar communities. Sorting oneself out is a difficult process
even when we have nothing extraordinarily different about ourselves.
Just to become a man, or a woman, in our world is becoming
increasingly an ordeal. The crystalline delineation between the
sexes doesn't reflect the reality of the human condition and, it
seems, the fewer people who manage to force themselves into the
parts, the more distinct we attempt to construct the lines. We
should be stepping back and examining the premises upon which
society has been built, not erecting walls and cementing ourselves
behind them.
Sectioning human beings into two categories presents difficulties
for those without striking differentiation, but the complications
for those with such differentiation also creates problems. Not only
"Who Am I?" but "What Am I?" Most attempts to answer this
latter question have led to societal deception and self-deception.
As an example let us once more examine "transsexuality." Is
it a condition or a process? Is it distinct from other gender
variations or a phase which can, when conditions predict, be reached
by any gender variant? Current hypothesis has it that transsexuals
are born transsexual. Those who manage to reach and obtain
surgery are considered, if not females trapped in male bodies,
certainly a mistake of nature, a much more compelling mistake than
other males who present as women. Accordingly transsexuals who
want surgery and hormones have a vested interest in embracing
definitions of their condition by the medical community, definition
which label them as birth defects or mistakes of nature. In truth,
all gallae are viewed as mistakes of nature. They fall outside the
naive world view presently available in our gender dysphoric society
and, make no mistake about it, our society is gender dysphoric.
How do we deal with our differences? Humans are pack
animals, much akin to wolves. Each of us has an independent nature,
but we also want to run with the pack. How can we accommodate our
own requirements with the requirements of the pack? Young males (and
young females) with bright creative minds are experimental and no
where is this more obvious than in issues concerning gender and
sexuality. Creative minds recognize more potentialities within
themselves. If parts of their physiology or mental perspective
doesn't reflect that of their peer group, they discern the
difference. Difference, in our uncultivated society. is seen as
defective. Our society is uncultivated because, for the most part,
children are expected to become men and women without adults
participating in any major way. Some parents do act as role models,
but even then they provide only two models, man and woman. The
insecurities that some children have, their fears and anxieties, are
rarely if ever noticed and when they are noticed are thought to be a
phase the child will grow out of. Some children do grow out of
such phases, most do not.
Males tend to discover their feelings of sexuality earlier than
females. It is often suggested that this is because the male sexual
apparatus is out in the open where it can be bumped, touched, and
handled. Whether this is the entire answer or not, it is certainly
true that young males generally masturbate at a younger age than
females. It is also true that young boys who are "pals"
sometimes masturbate each other and may even perform other sexual
services for each other. "I'll show you mine, if you show me
yours," becomes "I'll do you, if you do me." Of course
adults never discuss such things for fear of embarrassment and for
fear of putting thoughts in their children's heads. In short, our
uncultivated populace hasn't the foggiest notion of how to help
children deal with feelings, urges, and inclinations that are a
normal part of growing up. Most adults feel guilty and have
unresolved issues over their own childhood behavior and, as parents,
are unprepared to deal with their children's blossoming sexuality, a
sexuality that begins virtually at birth.
Some males who play sexual games with each other move on and
leave it behind, some do not. Although a strong argument can be made
for genetic propensity as causative in homosexuality, the reality
appears to be that the human animal is simply a sexual animal.
Males, unfettered by rules and encouraged by their peers, will do
anything that feels good and almost everything feels good. This
suggests that homosexuality, as it exists in society today, isn't a
sexual issue. It is a gender issue. Healthy males enjoy sex, end
quote. Males who want to be close to other males are expressing
much deeper needs than mere sexual gratification.
As if to emphasize this point, there are other young males who
are solitary masturbators. They express their creativity with
various objects from toilet roll cylinders, vacuum hoses, washrags,
towels, and women's silky underwear, to an almost endless list of
items and methodology. All of these children enjoy fantasizing and
their fantasies are often far reaching with ramifications that
predict future sexual behavior.
A bootstrap program in a computer is the basic program that
allows a computer to accept other programs. When we are young our
bootstrap program is our sexuality and our emotional perspectives.
Everything else develops slowly, but absolutely, from how we
interface our bootstrap programming with our creativity, our
environment, and our growing self-knowledge. Thus, if we are mostly
male with dormant feminine characteristics we experience things
leading to manhood, and mostly female children become women. Role
models for men and women are in abundance and, relatively speaking,
it easy to find someone to emulate. However, if your sexual
identity or sexual gender are not crystal clear, there are almost no
role models.
In the absence of gender variant role models, gender variant
children are led to believe that they must pick one of two and that
nothing else is available. Gender blends are virtually ignored,
thought to be defective, and approved of only to the extent they can
make themselves invisible. Which is why transsexuals are encouraged
to attempt to merge imperceptibly into the mainstream.
Transsexuals are virtually required to view themselves as women
trapped in male bodies. Yet, the majority talking about their
earliest feelings recall a time when they considered themselves
homosexual, fetishistic, transvestite, or transgendered. Upon
arrival, deciding they are transsexual, earlier views are dismissed,
not as stages of development in a process, but as mistakes in
analysis of their condition. They confabulate a conviction of always
having been transsexual. They had only thought they were gay,
transvestite, or transgendered. That the incidence of males
presenting as women is a single process operating differently
depending on an array of diverse variables is not considered.
What is the process and how does it work?
The mind operates on similar principles to Newton's laws of
physics. A mind moving in a given direction tends to remain in
motion unless operated on by an opposite and equal force. Moreover,
a mind in motion tends to "accelerate" in the direction of motion,
protecting itself from opposing forces. The majority of gallae
reveal this when relating how the need to dress escalates as time
passes. The urge becomes stronger and the need to present as women
becomes intense, irresistible. However, their are societal pressures
brought to bear that discourage gallae from forward motion. With few
exceptions males who present as women, in their early phases, go
through periods of purging. They destroy their feminine wardrobe and
attempt to resist dressing and presenting as women.
Transsexuals too, go through periods of purging and episodic
behavior, as they evolve through the different stages. The
transsexual need to express femininity is thought to be simply more
profound than that of her sisters. Is it more profound? To become a
post-operative transsexual requires accumulation of a portfolio of
bona fides and an accumulation of a large amount of money. There are
she-males, female impersonators, crossdressers, transvestites,
transgendered, and gay males who express the desire for surgical and
chemical modification of their bodies. There are a lot of factors
that may preclude males from obtaining these procedures. They first
must be willing to jump through the hoops of the medical
establishment, either convincing, possibly deceiving, that
establishment, themselves, or both. They must accumulate a portfolio
of credentials including one or two years of living as a woman (or
lying about same), recommendations from one or two psychiatrists,
two to six months of counseling in an accepted gender clinic, and,
last but not least, fifteen to twenty thousand dollars.
If a male who presents as a woman manages to accumulate these
necessities they will be allowed surgical modification and, no
matter what their expression might have been, they become post-op
transsexual. Failure to accumulate these bona fides indicates
that the person wasn't motivated enough to be a transsexual and
therefore is something other than a transsexual. Objectively it is
an obvious marriage of circular reasoning with self-fulfilling
delusion, not solely of the transsexual, but of the medical
establishment as well. This is one of the cruelest things done to
males who present as women who, for whatever reason, can not obtain
surgery.
Self-knowledge and experience is opening the world to all of us.
Many of us are discovering ourselves and the depth of our emotional
needs at earlier and earlier ages. As gender variants learn what and
who they are it opens doors to a better understanding of all people.
As gender variants in a bipolar society we have a vested interest in
self-discovery and in the process we can not help but learn a thing
or two about human behavior and the journey that we all must take to
develop from childhood to adulthood. No one is in a better
position or has more of a vested interest in lifting the illusions
and embracing reality. What we learn from exploring gender and
sexual variation may be the key to understanding the human
condition.